A Methodology for Long-Term Analysis of Innovative Signalling Systems on Regional Rail Lines

Luca D'Acierno, Marilisa Botte, Claudia Di Salvo, Chiara Caropreso, Bruno Montella

Abstract


A rail system may be considered a useful tool for reducing vehicular flows on a road system (i.e. cars and trucks), especially in high-density contexts such as urban and metropolitan areas where greenhouse gas emissions need to be abated. In particular, since travellers maximise their own utility, variations in mobility choices can be induced only by significantly improving the level-of-service of public transport. Our specific proposal is to identify the economic and environmental effects of implementing an innovative signalling system (which would reduce passenger waiting times) by performing a cost-benefit analysis based on a feasibility threshold approach. Hence, it is necessary to calculate long-term benefits and compare them with intervention costs. In this context, a key factor to be considered is travel demand estimation in current and future conditions. This approach was tested on a regional rail line in southern Italy to show the feasibility and utility of the proposed methodology.

Keywords


Microscopic rail system simulation; operational cost definition; public transport management; signalling system; travel demand estimation

Full Text:

PDF

References


European Commission, Climate Action: Reducing emissions from transport. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/index_en.htm (last access: September 2016).

J. Pachl, Railway operation and control. VTD Rail Publishing, Mountlake Terrace (WA), USA, 2009.

Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, Multi-Annual Action Plan. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.

E. Cascetta, Transportation systems analysis: models and applications. Springer, New York (NY), USA, 2009.

M. J. Smith, “The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria,” Transportation Research Part B, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 295–304, 1979.

W. Brog and E. Ampt, “State of the art in the collection of travel behaviour data,” in Travel Behaviour for the 1980’s, Special Report 201, National Research Council, Washington (DC), USA, 1982.

J. de D. Ortuzar and L. G. Willumsen, Modelling Transport, 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom, 2011.

T. A. Domencich and D. McFadden, Urban travel demand: a behavioural analysis. American Elsevier, New York (NY), USA, 1975.

J. Horowitz, “Identification and diagnosis of specification errors in the Multinominal Logit Model,” Transportation Research Part B, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 345–360, 1981.

C. F. Manski and D. McFadden, Structural Analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), USA, 1981.

M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), USA, 1985.

M. Ben-Akiva and T. Morikawa, “Estimation of switching models from revealed preference and stated intention,” Transportation Research

Part A, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 485–495, 1990.

J. de D. Ortuzar, “Stated Preference in travel demand modelling,” in Proc. WCTR 1992, Lyon, France, 1992.

H. -P. Lo and C. -P. Chan, “Simultaneous estimation of an origin-destination matrix and link choice proportions using traffic counts,” Transportation Research Part A, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 771–788, 2003.

E. Cascetta, A. Papola, V. Marzano, F. Simonelli and I. Vitiello, “Quasi-dynamic estimation of o-d flows from traffic counts: Formulation, statistical validation and performance analysis on real data,” Transportation Research Part B, vol. 55, pp. 171–187, 2013.

C. -C. Lu, X. Zhou and K. Zhang, “Dynamic origin-destination demand flow estimation under congested traffic conditions,” Transportation Research Part C, vol. 34, pp. 16–37, 2013.

L. D’Acierno, M. Gallo, B. Montella and A. Placido, “The definition of a model framework for managing rail systems in the case of breakdowns,” in Proc. IEEE ITSC 2013, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 1059-1064, 2013.

L. D’Acierno, A. Placido, M. Botte and B. Montella, “A methodological approach for managing rail disruptions with different perspectives,” International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 80–86, 2016.

R. Prinz, B. Sewcyk and M. Kettner, “NEMO: Network Evaluation Model for the Austrian railroad (ÖBB),” Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 117–121, 2001.

M. Kettner and B. Sewcyk, “A model for transportation planning and railway network evaluation,” in Proc. WCITS 2002, Chicago (IL), USA, 2002.

A. Nash and D. Huerlimann, “Railroad simulation using OpenTrack,” Computers in Railways, vol. 9, pp. 45–54, 2004.

T. Siefer and A. Radtke, “Railway simulation: key for better operation and optimal use of infrastructure,” in Proc. 1st International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Delft, The Netherlands, 2005.

M. Marinov and J. Viegas, “A mesoscopic simulation modelling methodology for analyzing and evaluating freight train operations in a rail network,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 516–539, 2011.

E. Quaglietta, “A microscopic simulation model for supporting the design of railway systems: Development and applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 2011.

G.E. Cantarella, “A general fixed-point approach to multimodal multi-user equilibrium assignment with elastic demand,” Transportation Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107–128, 1997.

S. Nguyen, S. Pallottino and M. Gendreau, “Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks,” Transportation Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 1998.

M. Ercolani, A. Placido, L. D’Acierno and B. Montella, “The use of microsimulation models for the planning and management of metro systems,” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 135,

pp. 509–521, 2014.

Istituto Nazionale di Statistica – ISTAT (Italian National Institute of Statistics). Population and housing census. Available: http://www.istat.it/it/censimento-popolazione (last access: September 2016).

Osservatorio sui comportamenti di mobilità degli italiani – AudiMob (Observatory on the Italian mobility behaviour). Regional mobility statistics. Available: http://www.isfort.it/sito/statistiche/Audimob.htm (last access: September 2016).

Istituto Nazionale di Statistica – ISTAT (Italian National Institute of Statistics). Resident population. Available: http://www.istat.it/it/popolazione (last access: September 2016).

B. Montella, L. D’Acierno and M. Gallo, “A multimodal approach for determining optimal public transport fares,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 21, pp. 2767–2781, 2014.

M. Gallo, B. Montella and L. D’Acierno, “The transit network design problem with elastic demand and internalisation of external costs: An application to rail frequency optimisation,” Transportation Research Part C, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1276–1305, 2011.

L. D’Acierno, M. Gallo and B. Montella, “Application of metaheuristics to large-scale transportation problems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8353, pp. 215–222, 2014.

M. Botte, C. Di Salvo, A. Placido, B. Montella and L. D’Acierno, “A Neighbourhood Search Algorithm for determining optimal intervention strategies in the case of metro system failures,” International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22149/teee.v1i3.56

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Luca D'Acierno, Marilisa Botte, Claudia Di Salvo, Chiara Caropreso, Bruno Montella

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

SSL Certificate